Old Testament Essay Topics - Writing a Great Old Testament Essay Topic

Old Testament Essay Topics - Writing a Great Old Testament Essay TopicThe Old Testament Essay Topics are crucial to doing your Old Testament Essay well. Your Old Testament Essay must be written in a way that is thought provoking and eye opening. Every word that you write will be watched by the Law, not just the Law of God, but all of us who are being tested here on earth.It is the God of the Bible who provides a common ground between man and woman. God is the Holy Spirit who gives us the ability to judge. Many times in life, our judgments have proven to be wrong. Now, is the time to make a correction in order to change this.To do this you must have a biblical perspective. You can only have this perspective, if you are willing to find it out for yourself. I recommend that you read some of the old testament and some of the new testament (New Testament) so that you can better understand the power and blessings of God's word.The Old Testament is a history of God's people who experienced God's truth. The New Testament is the history of the people who learn of God's truth. It is the history of the people who are actually living it.We, as a people, have many historical perspectives that were used to create our Bible. One of those perspectives was to use the Old Testament as a history of the people. This is an interesting point, because as a Biblical scholar, I find this perspective to be very wrong.It is very clear that God wrote the Old Testament, and it is just as clear that God wrote the New Testament. It is easy to see why my friend B.A. will not write an Old Testament Essay that is of good quality.Why would he make an essay with that sort of subject matter? That would be to avoid any trouble, because his Old Testament Essay Topic would appear to be 'objective' when it isn't.

Collaboration and Research Misconduct - Free Essay Example

The Review committee’s   chaired by Malcolm Beasley from Stanford University decision to exonerate Schon’s co-authors S. Berg; Ch. Kloc; B. Batlogg does not seem the most appropriate decision they should have made though different dimensions can be taken while dealing with such a case (Gross, 2016). Co-authors have a responsibility to ensure that the results submitted from any scientific findings are correct and free from fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. According to the review conducted, these three co-authors did not raise any conjunction which can either prove their ignorance or gross misconduct whereby Schon could have corrupted them (Gross, 2016). The principal investigators should conduct settings with their researchers to discuss the ongoing work, data interpretation, issues that may arise among others so as to ensure that data is not manipulated due to issues that may arise during the progress .Data management and ownership. Raw data should be preserved well for future review (Hartgerink, Wicherts, 2016). External data storage devices should be made available so as to ensure that the researcher does not blame missing or deleted data on storage availability. The authors with their co-authors should be fully made aware that the data they fill in can be used against them if any misconduct is found during future reviews (Smith, Hunt, Master, 2014). Misconduct on the institution where it happened has proved to have a negative effect that is detrimental on the institution in question. For instance, in the case where Bell Lab was the institution, further and future research finding from that institution remains questionable and is subjected to scrutiny and investigations may be opened for other researcher work conducted by that institution (Ludvigsson et al, 2015). The impact of research misconduct in todays society varies based on the level of fraud or misconduct committed. The cost can go high up to US$ 525,000 for a single investigation (Skerritt, Hall, 2015). Currently, with the high-level of technological advancement, any fraud can cause much hard within a short period due to issues like globalization where information follow fast and majority adapt quickly.